You may recall that in 2003, the ABC Television Network aired an episode of NYPD Blue, in which a woman undressed and stood totally naked in front of a child. The Second Circuit Court in New York City has declared war on American families. Second Circuit Court Says Nudity and Profanity are OK on TV at Any Time of Day…Even in front of Children!! 'Despicable Me' turns Universal into a digital-animation playerįederal Judges Declare War on America's Families! They'll be an adventure, but we suppose if any character is up for one, it's Curious George. Reboots of movies that haven't been gone very long - "Haunted Mansion" and "Spider-Man" - continue to remain in vogue in Hollywood. Seuss' the Lorax" movies as well as a sequel to "Despicable Me." After the success of that film, Meledandri's company is also developing "Where's Waldo?" and "Dr. Universal is very keen on Illumination, which with "Despicable" gave the studio a long-awaited family-friendly animation hit. It's getting a script from Larry Stuckey, who wrote the upcoming "Little Fockers," the third installment in the "Meet the Parents" franchise, for Universal. The Illumination film is expected to start from scratch. (A second installment, "Curious George 2: Follow that Monkey!," came out as a direct-to-DVD release in 2009.) Mired in development for years, the movie didn't entirely catch on with filmgoers, grossing just $58 million in the U.S. Universal and production company Imagine produced an animated "Curious George" just four years ago, in which Will Ferrell voiced the Man With the Yellow hat. and Margret Rey's text or the tail-less images) who's taken out of the jungle by an eccentric explorer to live in the city, where mischief always seems to find him. The movie is expected to feature the wry animated images of "Despicable Me" and will spin a new story of George the monkey/chimpanzee (depending on whether you favor H.A. Illumination Entertainment, the animation company founded by former Fox Animation President Chris Meledandri and whose movies Universal finances and distributes, is developing a new version of "Curious George." With 'Curious George,' Illumination Looks To Make More Animation MischiefĮXCLUSIVE: Filmgoers soon will have another round of adventures with the Man With the Yellow Hat. Anyone have any ideas?Įveryone take care, thank you for reading and if you happen to have Facebook you can now follow this blog though NetworkedBlogs as well. But while I’m watching it I can’t help but think about The Sarah Jane Adventures and H2O: Just Add Water since I had mentioned once before that they also reminded me of The Third Eye as well and it make me wonder what other show could be added to these three to have the four story arches like in the old days. Yea, I’ve just got too much going on as always, plus it’s more fun to just watch every night and find out. The commercials for the show are really good, they really make you want to tune in and find out what’s happening next time and the fact that you can follow along online is pretty cool however I do not. I think Alfie and Amber are totally useless and do nothing to move the story along but then as I said I missed it yesterday and from the description Amber had a big part in discovering one of the clues so perhaps I should hold off judgment on her.Īs of right now I think Patricia if my favorite character, she’s passionate and driven to find out that has happened to Joy which I really like however I do think that if she would just give Nina (the American girl right?) half a chance I think she’d find out a lot faster since I think that the two stories will eventually come together. The ONLY thing I don’t like about the show is all that teenage romance garbage. The acting…it is a little flimsy but the fact that it’s so well written really makes up for that. It’s mysterious and a little bit creepy and it really does keep you guessing as to what’s going to happen next. Heck, I’ve even got my Mom hooked on it and she said exactly the same thing. (Wasn’t my fault, had to take my Mom to get her eyes examined and thank you Jesus that it wasn’t cataracts as the first doctor had told her it was.)Īnyway…the show really is as good as I thought it would be, it really is like the old Third Eye episodes that use to air back in the day and since I have all four of the original titles and watched them last year I should know what I’m talking about. First I’d like to start off by apologizing for taking so long to get this posted, I actually missed the initial airing of the premier on the first (I was so tired that I fell asleep and missed it!) But thankfully Monday the 10th and Tuesday 11th they re-aired the premier episodes so I was able to watch it from the beginning despite having missed it yesterday.
0 Comments
11/14/2022 0 Comments Jennifer hudson giving myself away"What's Wrong (Go Away)," a ballad written and produced by T-Pain, who also guests, would be just fine without the auto-tune that is streaked across it. During "Pocketbook," Hudson is in top attitudinal form, but she is washed out by Timbaland's overstuffed beatbox-driven production and Ludacris' outlandish freakishness. Hudson's voice is smoothed out through the fluttery "If This Isn't Love" (not to mention spiked with grating male grunts of "Hey!"), nearly unrecognizable until the point where she belts. The latter is more common than the former. It's also the first song on the album and sets up a sequence of wild swings between direct hits and flailing misses. Lead single "Spotlight," released four months prior to the album, was both promising and satisfying, nearly a dead-center bull's-eye - dramatic but not over the top, powerful but not a gratuitous fireworks display, a melancholy but striking midtempo track with a gently thumping four-four pulse. Neither the treatments nor the accessories were necessary. Few vocalists as young as Hudson have a voice that is as versatile and expressive, proficient enough to pull off a multi-dimensional set of R&B songs, yet her debut is as tricked out as that of an artist with a small fraction of the talent. Anyone who has heard Hudson sing, whether through American Idol, Dreamgirls, or even that baffling duet on Meat Loaf's Bat Out of Hell III, would know she is capable of carrying an album without trendy gimmickry and guest MCs. Vocal effects, T-Pain, and Ludacris have their place - pop-oriented R&B singles fronted by life-like automatons with limited range, for instance - but beyond cynical sales interests, they make zero sense on a Jennifer Hudson album. 11/13/2022 0 Comments Sothink logo maker download crack– Incorrect translation of German language. – Cannot save the authoring file properly when using free built-in fonts. Design from monogram, rainbow texts, to doodle, feel free to mix and match all effects. Create a unique logo for business or personal use.Įxclusive hollow and split tools adds more diversity to logo design choices. Few mouse clicks quickly duplicate logo elements and styles with smart paint tools.ĭraw logo elements using hand-drawing tools - pen, pencil, brush and more in a WYSIWYG interface. Offers user-friendly interface that facilitates easy logo creations. Easily make text logos by converting text into shapes. Utilize rich effect styles from shadow, bevel, to gradient, with one-click application. Also support importing PNG/JPG/BMP/GIF/ SVG/SWF files for use in logo designs. Provide 450+ free logo templates and more than 5000 logo resources. You choose a dominant color and a pattern in Color Wheel, we list four-color palettes to colorize your logo. Over 2000 preset color schemes for any DIY design.
11/13/2022 0 Comments Foxpro 2.6 for windows
11/12/2022 0 Comments Truerta quick sweep disabledOk, thought experiment number three hundred and fifty nine for me. I'll have to try and find a spectrum of the FR where there is something in the cal file operating (have no idea where my mic has been corrected), measure and correct without a cal file, then load and measure with the cal file, compare the results and see if they do indeed at the end of the day measure the same. I will try and see if I can chase this down and post results. Hmm, I am just about to embark on a round of measurements. Unless I have it completely arse backwards of course!!! Then of course I don't want +5 db at 10 k to show. The only time I'd need to load the cal file is when I wanted to show you my speaker response, or my in room response. IF that logic is true.and I think it is.then I can make the further assumption that by correcting the mic by creating the inverse I will have 'infinitely' more points corrected than by (what I presume is something like notepad file) a mic cal file (?) When we make a cal file, of the mic alone, ultimately it is simply and inverse of itself anyway no? I can do that either by adding a cal file, or just by creating the inverse of the measurement. In other words the mic has automatically been corrected anyway. Now if I don't use a cal file, the speaker will 'measure' +7db at 10 k (+5 from the mic and +2 from the speaker), the software will correct that by adding -7 db at 10k (-5 for the mic and -2 for the speaker). (Let's also say the speaker is +2db at 10k).The speaker is corrected by the software (by adding-2b at 10k) to be flat. So I get a cal file which corrects it by adding -5 db at 10k, then make my measurements and corrections with the cal'd mic. That compensation will always be in the loop no matter what we do? It is not the stone age anymore, and once you get a real grip on what the room is doing to your system, well for me at least, things like cables and all the other minutiae *most* audiophiles concentrate on become insignificant. And for a computer idiot like me, to be able to 'master' REW certainly says something. How long a go was it that this sort of stuff was hideously expensive and beyond the reach of mere mortals like myself? Probably not even ten years ago. This is one area that lot of audiophiles simply don't know what they are missing. After all the deqx makes an inverse of the measurement, so the mic inaccuracy is automatically included in that.ĭunno about the Tact software, but the deqx software is a bit 'clunky' when I want to make quick measurements for adjusting levels and whatnot (gotta go thru wizrds and stuff) so I just whip the mic out of the deqx and throw it into the mixer then use REW. When for example I use the mic to correct with the deqx, I don't even bother with loading the cal file. Re using a cal file, I guess it depends on what you want. Already had the mic (from the deqx) so all that was needed for REW was a mic pre, can pick them up for fifty bucks or so. I use the deqx and it's software, and in addition use REW. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |